Free trade agreements are international treaties concluded between two parties (individual countries or transnational groupings) to ensure free trade. In the modern world, free trade policy is often implemented through a formal and mutual agreement between the nations concerned. However, a free trade policy may simply be the absence of trade restrictions. The trade agreement database provided by itC`s Market Access Card. With hundreds of free trade agreements currently in place and under negotiation (around 800 under ITC`s Rules of Origin Facilitator, including non-reciprocal trade agreements), it is important for businesses and policymakers to keep an eye on their status. There are a number of custodians of free trade agreements that are available at the national, regional or international level. Among the most important are the database on Latin American free trade agreements created by the Latin American Integration Association (LAIA)[23], the database maintained by the Asian Centre for Regional Integration (ARIC) containing information agreements between Asian countries[24] and the portal on european union negotiations and free trade agreements. [25] On the other hand, some domestic industries benefit. They find new markets for their duty-free products. These industries are growing and hiring more workers. These compromises are the subject of endless debate among economists. Not surprisingly, financial markets see the other side of the coin. Free trade is an opportunity to open up another part of the world to domestic producers.

In addition, free trade has become an integral part of the financial system and the investment world. U.S. investors now have access to most foreign financial markets and a wider range of securities, currencies and other financial products. Economists have tried to assess the extent to which free trade agreements can be considered public goods. They first address a key element of free trade agreements, namely the system of integrated tribunals that act as arbitrators in international trade disputes. These serve as a clarifying force for existing laws and international economic policies, as reaffirmed in trade agreements. [18] Unlike a customs union, parties to a free trade agreement do not maintain common external tariffs, which means that they apply different tariffs and policies towards non-members. This property creates the possibility that non-parties can make stowaway preferences under a free trade agreement by entering the market with the lowest external fares. Such a risk requires the introduction of rules to identify originating products eligible for preferences under a free trade agreement, which is not necessary when forming a customs union. [20] In principle, a minimum level of processing is required, leading to a “substantial transformation” of the goods in order for them to be considered as originating […].


Publié le